The most detailed free FDE + DevOps library: 140+ lessons, 70+ labs and 80 long-form articles, in English and Turkish. Start learning →

AI Keeps Fixing the Same Bug: How to Escape the Loop

Updated · Tech checked

Stop regenerating: write the repro, test one hypothesis at a time, restore the last working snapshot on the second failure, ask for human help with a packaged report.

The direct answer

Escaping the loop takes four moves: write expected versus actual with steps, test one hypothesis with one check, restore the last working snapshot when the second fix fails, and re-ask with the packaged report. Never send the same message a third time hoping for luck.

Controlled example

Two quantity fields hold "30" and "40": expected 70, actual "3040" because the values join as text. Hypothesis one: inputs read as text. Check: log both types. Fix: convert to numbers before adding, then re-run. If the next fix also fails, restore the snapshot and re-report with the log attached.

Method and mistakes

One variable per test; last change is suspect one; assumptions written down. The loop pattern is regenerate, skim, regenerate, with no written repro and no snapshot.

Frequently asked questions

When should I stop and ask a human? After two failed fixes with a written repro: post the packaged report (steps, logs, last change, tries) in a help channel.

Is the loop my fault? No. It is the normal shape of vague retries; the Module 7 method exists exactly for this.

Sources and review

Bu sayfanın Türkçesi